PRAMOD VARSHNEY AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/18456/2025 · 2025-10-08
Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18456 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Sri Varad Nath, learned counsel for the petitioners states that cause for filing the writ petition no more survives.
2. Sri K.N. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Sri Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 have no objection to the same.
3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
October 9, 2025 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Varad Nath Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shivam Yadav, C.S.C., Chaman Aara, Kaushalendra Nath Singh, Manoj Kumar (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Pramod Varshney And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad