SATVIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/31107/2025 · 2025-09-19
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65167 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65167 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-31107-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CRM-M-31107-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.09.2025 Satvir Singh and others
....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Akshay Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Shukla, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL)
1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.0050 dated 30.03.2025 registered under Sections 126 (2) 115 (2), 191(3), 190, 110, 61(2), 238 BNS at Police Station City-I, Sangrur, (Annexure P- 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 26.04.2025 (Annexure P-2).
2. This Court vide order dated 21.08.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangrur and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, ARCHANA ARORA 2025.09.23 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-31107-2025 (O&M) 2 learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 09.09.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench
judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed FIR No.0050 dated 30.03.2025 registered under Sections 126 (2) 115 (2), 191(3), 190, 110, 61(2), 238 BNS at Police Station City-I, Sangrur, (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/settlement dated 26.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed.
7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s)
disposed of, accordingly.
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 19.09.2025 JUDGE archana Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ARCHANA ARORA 2025.09.23 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document