Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93910 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18981 of 2025 Applicant :- Nagendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rafeek Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Heard Sri Rafeek Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajeev Dhar Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 25 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 109, 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station Pisava, District Aligarh during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, applicant is named in the FIR but from the statement of the injured person, it reflects, he did not cause any injury either to the injured or to the deceased and these injuries were caused by co-accused Prashant, Jitesh Sharma and Harish and after considering this fact, co- accused Gaurav Kumar has been released on bail by this Court and his bail order has been annexed at page-86 of the paper-book and on facts, case of applicant is at par with him. 4. He further submits, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 14.03.2025. 5. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 7. However, applicant is named in the FIR but from the statement of injured person, it reflects, co-accused Prashant, Jitesh Sharma and Harish opened fire and due to the fire opened by them deceased and injured sustained injuries. 8. Further, along with applicant co-accused Gaurav Kumar was also named in the FIR but he has been released on bail by this Court and on facts, case of applicant is at par with him. 9. Further, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 14.03.2025. 10. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 11. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 12. Let the applicant - Nagendra Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 13. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 14. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 AK Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad