ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED v. CAPTAIN TRACTORS PRIVATE LIMITED
(TM) A/128/2025 · 2026-06-08
K Kumaresh Babu
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6516 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6516 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(TM) A No. 128 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU (TM) A No. 128 of 2025 in OP(TM).No.29 of 2024 Ashok Leyland Limited No.1, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. Captain Tractors Private Limited Represented by its Authorized Representative, Arvind D.Shingla, 106, Royal Complex, Near Bhutkhana Chowk, Dhebar Road, Rajkot - 360 002, Gujarat. 2. The Registrar of Trade Marks Trade Marks Registry, Intellectual Property Office Building, G.S.T.Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This application is filed to permit the applicant to file the schedule mentioned documents as additional documents in the present petition OP (TM)No.29 of 2024. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.K.Premchandar For Respondent(s) : Mr.A.K.Balaji for R1 Mr.V.Chandrasekaran for R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
(TM) A No. 128 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The instant application had been taken out to permit the applicant to file the schedule mentioned documents as additional documents in the main original petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. It is the case of the applicant that an application had been taken up by the first respondent who are framing additional issues which was ordered by this Court on 20.11.2025. Only to seek proper adjudication of the additional issues framed, the documents in the judges summons schedule are sought to be introduced. 4. Eventhough the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent had vehemently opposed the receipt of documents, it has to be seen that this Court by its order dated 20.11.2025, had framed additional issues for the purpose of providing clarity in adjudication and only in that regard, these documents in the judges summons schedule are sought to be introduced. Hence, this Court is of the opinion that the same could also be taken subject to the proof of its contents and relevancy to the issues involved in the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
(TM) A No. 128 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4
5. With the aforesaid observation, this application is ordered. 08-06-2026 1/2 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rap To
1. Captain Tractors Private Limited Represented by its Authorized Representative, Arvind D.Shingla, 106, Royal Complex, Near Bhutkhana Chowk, Dhebar Road, Rajkot - 360 002, Gujarat. 2.
The Registrar of Trade Marks Trade Marks Registry, Intellectual Property Office Building, G.S.T.Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
(TM) A No. 128 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. rap (TM) A No. 128 of 2025 08-06-2026 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis