Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65114 (PNJ)

SHAKUNTLA v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE FARIDKOT CUM APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND

CWP/15731/2025 · 2025-05-28

Harsimran Singh Sethi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 CWP-15731-2025 Date of Decision :28.05.2025 Shakuntla ...Petitioner Versus District Magistrate, Faridkot-cum-Appellate Authority and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Rahul, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents required to prove that the orders impugned in the present petition are factually incorrect, could not be brought on record hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with correct particulars. 2. Ordered accordingly. May 28, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.05.29 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document