Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65108 (PNJ)

DR SUGREEV NAGAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/15946/2025 · 2025-05-28

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No. 15946 of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (133) CWP No. 15946 of 2025 Date of Decision : 28.05.2025 Dr. Sugreev Nagar and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they are entitled ₹ for arrears of stipend of 67,968/- per month while they were undergoing the Diplomat of National Board Course starting from November, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the entitled benefit is not being released to the petitioners, which is causing prejudice to them. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the representation dated 21.03.2025 (Annexure P-8) but the same is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf Kanchan 2025.05.28 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP No. 15946 of 2025 2 of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the representation dated 21.03.2025 (Annexure P-8) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. May 28, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No Kanchan 2025.05.28 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment