IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54151 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2025 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Dhanik Yadav @ Dhanik Prasad S/O Vallabh Yadav R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna 2. Raju Yadav @ Raju Kumar S/O Vallabh Yadav R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna 3. Arvind Yadav @ Arvind Kumar S/O Vallabh Yadav R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna 4. Vivek Yadav S/O Vallabh Yadav R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna 5. Shalendra Yadav @ Shailendra Prasad S/O Vallabh Yadav R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna 6. Mantu Saw S/O Krishna Saw R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna 7. Adalat Yadav S/O Jogi Yadav R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna 8. Krishan Nandan Saw S/O Pradeep Saw R/O Vill. - Harauli, P.S. - Barh, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 21-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the prayer for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no. 4, namely, Vivek Yadav who was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54151 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 2/3 respect to petitioner no. 4 is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 132, 121(1), 121(2), 352 and 221 of the BNS. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners no. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 are persons with clean antecedent and petitioners no. 6 and 7 have antecedent of two cases, though inadvertently at para 3 it has been pleaded that petitioners no. 6 and 7 have antecedent of one case. It is further submitted that informant alleges that on receiving information about Nawal Yadav, the informant with the police force reached the place of occurrence where Nawal Yadav was present but he challenged the force that they cannot arrest him and started shouting when 20–25 persons gathered and attacked the force with sticks, bricks and stones on account of which police personnel received injury. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that no specific allegation of assault is alleged and similarly situated co-accused, namely, Javahar Yadav @ Javahar Prasad had approached this Court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54151 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 3/3 seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 49998 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 11.08.2025 passed by a learned Coordinate Bench of this Court. 8. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners no. 1, 2, 3 and 5 to 8 above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 272 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T