CR-4628-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 Rachit Gupta Tarun Soni CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.04.2019 Division), Ludhiana, whereby the application of the respondent under Order VI Rule 17 for amendment of plaint was allowed. 2. to the year of motion order dated the last 02 dates again, for the 3 case having been called twice. 3. indicates that notice issued to served through his wife. However, none has put in appearance on behalf of the sole respondent. 2019 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4628 Date of Decision: Rachit Gupta Versus Tarun Soni CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.04.2019 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby the application of the respondent under Order VI Rule 17 for amendment of plaint was allowed. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) reveals that to the year 2019 and has come up for hearing after the year 202 of motion in the present case was issued order dated 25.07.2019. Further perusal of the order the last 02 dates of hearing the petitioner had gone un again, for the 3rd time the petitioner had gone un case having been called twice. Moreover, office report dated indicates that notice issued to the sole respondent has been received back served through his wife. However, none has put in appearance on behalf of the sole respondent. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4628-2019 Date of Decision: 18.07.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Prayer in the instant revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the impugned order dated ) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby the application of the respondent-plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 for amendment of plaint was allowed. reveals that the matter pertains has come up for hearing after the year 2023. Notice issued by a co-ordinate Bench vide Further perusal of the order-sheets reveals that on of hearing the petitioner had gone un-represented. Today gone un-represented, despite the Moreover, office report dated 22.01.2025/18.07.2025, the sole respondent has been received back served through his wife. However, none has put in appearance on behalf Prayer in the instant revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the impugned order dated ) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior plaintiff he matter pertains vide n . Today , despite the , the sole respondent has been received back served through his wife. However, none has put in appearance on behalf RISHU KATARIA 2025.07.21 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-4628-2019 4. has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. O casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel is seriously interested in pursuing the present Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. 5. 6. 18.07.2025 rishu 2019 -2- A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. On the other hand, the petitioner has and careless approach. It is clear that seriously interested in pursuing the present Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .07.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable A bare reading of the above facts shows that the petitioner exhibited an utterly casual attitude in their pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the petitioner in the petitioner has adopted an utterly and careless approach. It is clear that neither the petitioner nor his seriously interested in pursuing the present revision. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non- Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No suit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the in the adopted an utterly his . Thus, this RISHU KATARIA 2025.07.21 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.