Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6509 (GAU)

M/S SANTANA ENTERPRISE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

WP(C)/497/2025 · 2025-02-09

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010016802025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/497/2025 M/S SANTANA ENTERPRISE REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SRI PANKAJ KALITA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF KANAK CHANDRA KALITA, OFFICE ADDRESS AT- 52-A, BONPHOOL NAGAR PATH, LAST GATE DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, P.O.- ASSAM SACHIBALAYA, P.S. DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE (B) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) DEPARTMENT ASSAM RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-6. 4:THE TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL EVALUATION COMMITTEE HEADED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) DEPARTMENT ASSAM RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-6. 5:M/S JARIO INC GUWAHATI Page No.# 2/3 THROUGH OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) DEPARTMENT ASSAM RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-6. 6:M/S MIRUSI ENTERPRISE GUWAHATI THROUGH OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) DEPARTMENT ASSAM RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-6 7:M/S. S. S. ENTERPRISE GUWAHATI THROUGH OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) DEPARTMENT ASSAM RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-6 8:M/S. TRADE SUPPLY INDIA GUWAHATI THROUGH OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) DEPARTMENT ASSAM RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-6.(NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENT NO.5 AND 8 MAY BE SERVED THROUGH THE RESPONDENT NO.3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N KALITA, MR. S K ROY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, SC, TRIBAL AFFAIRS (PLAIN) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 10.02 .2025 Mr. S.K. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ Page No.# 3/3 petitioner does not wish to press the writ petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending I.A., if any, also stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant