IN THE H 283-1 ANPUM GUPT U.T. CHANDIG CORAM: HON Present : Non Mr. Non MANISHA BAT The fact that the matt It ap petition any more 28.01.2025 Jyoti-IV HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of de UPTA Versus NDIGARH AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI None for the petitioner. Mr. C.S. Bakshi, Addl. P.P. U.T., Ch None for respondent No.2. **** A BATRA, J. (oral) There is no representation on beha e matter has been passed over twice. It appears that the petitioner is not i y more. Hence, the same is dismissed (M Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/N Whether reportable : Yes/N AB AND HARYANA RH M No.41688 of 2021 e of decision: 28.01.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA .T., Chandigarh. behalf of the petitioner despite the s not interested to pursue the present issed for want of prosecution. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE es/No. es/No e the esent Jyoti 2025.01.29 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order Chandigarh