Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65084 (ALL)

KRISHADEV GHANSHYAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/18644/2025 · 2025-05-29

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93914 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18644 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishadev Ghanshyam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3/Sub Division Magistrate Tehsil Badlapur, District Jaunpur to consider the application of petitioner for restoring the stone used for demarcation of the land of the petitioner situated at Arazi No. 207 area 0.0160, Arazi No. 228, area 0.2510 hectare at village Mauza Babura, Pargana- Rari, Tehsil- Badlapur, District Jaunpur. In pursuance of the order dated 24.07.2024 passed in case no. 1647 of 2024 (Krishnadev V/s Gram Panchayat and others) under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that after installation of boundary marks in pursuance of order passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the private respondents have removed the boundary marks illegally. In this regard, petitioner has moved an application before the authority but the same has not been considered. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the application given by the petitioner is not in proper format as provided under Section 22/23 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 5. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application under Section 22/23 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In case, such an application is moved before the appropriate authority within one week from today, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent No. 3 within six weeks thereafter in accordance with law after hearing all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad