Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6508 (HP)

Tarsem Bharti v. Narinder Kumar AND ANR

CMP.M/137/2025 · 2025-06-02

Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tarsem Bharti Vs. Narinder Kumar Verma & Another CMP (M) No. 137 of 2025 2.6.2025 Present: Mr.Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. None for respondents. CMP (M) No. 137 of 2025 Despite service of respondents during the month of March, 2025 (11th and 18th March, 2025), till date respondents have not come forward to ensure their representation or to contest the application. Hence respondents are proceeded against ex parte. For the reasons stated in the application, submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and considering the documents filed with the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The appeal be registered. The application stands disposed of. FAO (MVA) No…... of 2025 (FAOST No. 52278 of 2024) Be registered. Admit. Post admission notice to respondents, returnable on next date, on taking steps within four days, be issued. Records be requisitioned. List on 11th August, 2025. CMP No. ….. of 2025 (CMPST No. …. of 2024) Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith up to date interest in the Registry of this Court on or before 31st July, 2025, operation and execution of impugned award dated 18.12.2023 passed by MACT (III), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. in M.A.C.C. RBT No. 21-S/2 of 2022/19, titled as Narinder Kumar Vs. Tarsem Bharti and Another shall remain stayed during pendency of appeal. Needless to say failure in deposit of awarded amount shall result into automatic vacation of interim protection. Alteration/vacation/modification on motion. The application stands disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. 2nd June, 2025 (Keshav)