Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6507 (JHR)

AMIT KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1529/2025 · 2025-03-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1529 of 2025 ------ Amit Kumar Singh, aged about 35 years, son of Parmod Singh, Resident of Village Dadhapa, Post Kutumba, Police Station Kutumba, District Aurangabad, State Bihar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Hariharganj P.S. Case No.89 of 2024 instituted under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the informant sold his truck to the petitioner, with the condition that he will pay Rs.16,00,000/- to Tata Motor Finance Company and Rs.1,21,000/- to the informant but the petitioner only paid Rs.5,50,000/- to the said Tata Motor Finance Company and refused to pay the rest amount. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties is basically a civil dispute. It is further submitted that without cancellation of the hypothecation agreement, the informant, with an ill intention, entered into the agreement with the petitioner for selling the said vehicle. It is also submitted that the vehicle in question is lying with the police. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. at Palamau in connection with Hariharganj P.S. Case No.89 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/