210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18815-2017 DECIDED ON: 17.09.2025 NIKHIL KUMAR RAI .....PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: None for the petitioner Mr. Harneet S. Oberoi, Advocate and Mr. Ketan Garg, Advocate for respondents. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) Today there is no representation on behalf of the petitoner. Perusal of the case file shows that on earlier two occasion also, the situation was same. In the light of above, this Court is of the view that the petitioner does not want to pursue with the instant petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 17.09.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.09.18 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document