VIVEK KUMAR v. UPPAR AYUKAT (NYAYIK) PRAYAGRAJ MANDAL PRAYAGRAJ AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/18027/2025 · 2025-05-29
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93470 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18027 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Respondent :- Uppar Ayukat (Nyayik) Prayagraj Mandal Prayagraj And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Azad Rai,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"(1).
शददय नययययलय दयरय परमयददश पकक तत मम आददश,
अथवय तनदरश पयररत कर तवपकक ससखयय 1 (
अपर आययक (नययतयक)
पययगरयज मणडल पययगरयज)
कक तनदरतशत तकयय जयवद तक अपकलयथर दयरय पसतयत (तवचयरयधकन) अपकल
ससखयय 1571/2023
कमपययटरककक त वयद ससखयय C 202302000001571,
बमयकदमय तववदक कय मयर बनयम इसयक अलक आतद,
अनतगरत धयरय 24 (4)
उतर पददश रयजसव ससतहतय 2006,
पर यथय शकघ सयनवयई हदतय उतचत आजय पयररत तकयद
जयनद हदतय आजय पयररत तकयद जयनद कक अनयकमपय कक जयवम ।"
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the aforementioned appeal is pending before respondent no.1 for adjudication. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. The present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No. 1 to consider and decide the aforementioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the respondents and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad