IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 102 Dr. Kawaljit Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CM-9871-CWP CM-9872-CWP needful. CM-9892-CWP reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The order IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-9871 CM-9872 CM-9891 CM-9 CWP Date of decision Dr. Kawaljit Kaur Versus f Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. R.S.Cheema, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate and Ms. Shefali Bahia, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CWP-2025 and CM-9891-CWP-2025 Allowed as prayed for. CWP-2025 Allowed as prayed for. Registry is directed to do the CWP-2025 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The order IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9871-CWP-2025, 9872-CWP-2025, 9891-CWP-2025 and 9892-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-18679-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 24.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate and 2025 Registry is directed to do the g heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The order PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.24 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-18679-2017 -2- dated 03.07.2025 is recalled and the main petition is taken on Board today itself. CWP-18679-2017 1. Learned counsel submits that the Notification dated 15.01.2015, based on which the impugned order fixing the pay of the petitioner was passed, has since been quashed, vide judgment dated 13.09.2018 passed in CWP-8922-2017, he prays for withdrawal of the present petition to approach the respondents-State by filing a representation, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. Disposed of. In case, the representation is filed within 4 weeks, the same be decided within a further period of 4 months from its receipt, in accordance with law. However, if the petitioner is found entitled, the benefit be released forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to her and shall contain reasons, whereupon she shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 24.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.24 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.