SRI SHEKHAR S/O RUDRAPPA BHAJANATRI v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
WP/107295/2024 · 2025-09-18
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65040 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65040 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12657 WP No. 107295 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107295 OF 2024 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
SRI. SHEKHAR S/O. RUDRAPPA BHAJANATRI, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER -CUM- CONDUCTOR, NO.5748/4930 AT DEPOT NO.1, NWKRTC, BELAGAVI DIVISION, BELAGAVI. R/O.H.NO.46, KORVI GALLI,BELAGAVI DIST. BELAGAVI-590005 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.S. HARAVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR NORTH WEST KARNATAKA ROAD, TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST.DHARWAD-580009. 2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NORTH WEST KARNATAKA ROAD, TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BELAGAVI DIVISION, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-580010. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER NORTH WEST KARNATAKA ROAD, TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BELAGAVI, DEPORT NO.1, DIST. BELAGAVI-590010. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12657 WP No. 107295 of 2024
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO 1. ISSUE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONTINUE THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONER IN THE ALTERNATIVE POST AT 3RD RESPONDENT DEPOT FORTHWITH OR ELSE CHANGE THE CADRE OF PETITIONER TO THE POST SUITABLE TO HIS QUALIFICATION WITH THE SAME SCALE OF PAY AND SERVICE BENEFITS.2. PASS ANY APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMS FIT BY THIS HON BLE COURT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION WITH COST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. ISSUE writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to continue the services of the petitioner in the alternative post at 3rd respondent depot forthwith or else change
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12657 WP No. 107295 of 2024
the cadre of petitioner to the post suitable to his qualification with the same scale of pay and service benefits. ii. PASS any appropriate order or direction as deems fit by this Hon’ble Court under the facts and circumstances of the case by allowing this writ petition with cost in the interest of justice and equity. 2.
A memo singed by the petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner, has been filed, which reads as under;
“In the above writ petition, the petitioner has sought for writ of Mandamus. That, the petitioner do not want to prosecute the above writ petition and hence it is just and necessary to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Wherefore, the Petitioner most humbly prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. Accepting the said memo and submission of the counsel for the petitioner, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12657 WP No. 107295 of 2024
4. In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
VB Ct:pa List No.: 1 Sl No.: 139