Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65036 (PNJ)

GURDEEP SINGH AND ORS. v. PUNJABI UNIVERSITY PATIALA AND ORS.

CWP/20254/2019 · 2025-08-20

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 209 Gurdeep Singh and others Punjabi University and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for the respondents. (through hybrid mode) *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel filed by way of short affidavit of 02.08.2023, which reads thus: 2. Learned counsel states that all the petitioners have retired and in case, they have not been released the pensionary benefits as stated in the aforesaid para, 3. Ordered accordingly. 20.08.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20254 Date of decision: 20.08.2025 Gurdeep Singh and others Versus Punjabi University and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for the respondents. (through hybrid mode) *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents refers to para 4 of the reply by way of short affidavit of the Registrar, Punjabi University, Patiala, dated 02.08.2023, which reads thus:- “That similarly retiral benefits pertaining to petitioner No.7 are in process and soon all his retiral benefits pertaining to 33 years will be paid very soon. Rather, petitioner No.7 will also be given some benefit of his work charged service as he was regularized in the year 1992 but he will also be paid pensionary benefits pertaining to 33 y far as the other petitioners are concerned it is submitted that they are still in service and as and when they will retire they will paid all the pensionary benefits their service regular as well as work charged but to the maximum Therefore the present petition is nothing but an abuse of process of law.” Learned counsel states that all the petitioners have retired and in they have not been released the pensionary benefits as stated in the aforesaid para, they be granted liberty to revive the present petition. Ordered accordingly. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 20254-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.08.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for the respondents. for the respondents refers to para 4 of the reply Registrar, Punjabi University, Patiala, dated “That similarly retiral benefits pertaining to petitioner No.7 l his retiral benefits pertaining to 33 years will be paid very soon. Rather, petitioner No.7 will also be given some benefit of his work charged service as he was regularized in the year 1992 but he will also be paid pensionary benefits pertaining to 33 years as per the rules. So far as the other petitioners are concerned it is submitted that they are still in service and as and when they will retire they will paid all the pensionary benefits their service regular as well as work charged but to the maximum of 33 years. Therefore the present petition is nothing but an abuse of Learned counsel states that all the petitioners have retired and in they have not been released the pensionary benefits as stated in the be granted liberty to revive the present petition. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No for the respondents refers to para 4 of the reply Registrar, Punjabi University, Patiala, dated “That similarly retiral benefits pertaining to petitioner No.7 l his retiral benefits pertaining to 33 years will be paid very soon. Rather, petitioner No.7 will also be given some benefit of his work charged service as he was regularized in the year 1992 but he will also be paid ears as per the rules. So far as the other petitioners are concerned it is submitted that they are still in service and as and when they will retire they will paid all the pensionary benefits their service regular as of 33 years. Therefore the present petition is nothing but an abuse of Learned counsel states that all the petitioners have retired and in they have not been released the pensionary benefits as stated in the ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.21 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document