IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55463 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2020 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1. Sonu Yadav S/O Bhairo Yadav R/O Kola Narayanpur, P.S- Jagdishpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur. 2. Durga Yadav S/O Bharo Yadav R/O Kola Narayanpur, P.S- Jagdishpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56466 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2020 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ashok Yadav son of Late Ishwar yadav Village- Kola Narayanpur Ps- Jagdishpur Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 55463 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56466 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmveer Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 30-01-2025 Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 423 of 2020 registered for the offence Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55463 of 2024(3) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the victim. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent, and they are in custody since 11.03.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and the learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the final argument is going on. 6. In this case there is a report that in the trial all the 21 charge-sheeted have been examined, and the case was fixed for recording of statement on 13.09.2024. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, these applications are dismissed. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T