IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1740 of 2025 1. Sarad Hemrom @ Sharad Hembrom , Aged about 35 years, S/o- Avinash Kumar Hemrom, R/o-Village-Haranganj, Chanho No. 1, PO.-Hazaribagh, P.S.-Korrah, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand- 825303 2. Avinash Kumar Hemrom, Aged about 55 years, S/o-Late Vishram Dayal Hemrom, R/o-Village-Haranganj, Chanho No. 1, P.O.- Hazaribagh, P.S.-Korrah, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand- 825303 3. Pranav Kachhap, Aged about 35 years, S/o-Late Kenet Kachhap, R/o- Hurhuru, Ranchi-Patna Road, P.O.- Hazaribagh, P.S.- Korrah, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand-825303 … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Adv. For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey , Addl.. PP 02 / 18.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 89 of 2024 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 387, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, after preparing a forged genealogical table, purchased his land from their vendor to grab the land of the informant. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there is no allegation of any impersonation by the vendor of the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 15 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and they undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Hazaribag in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 89 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-