1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3088 OF 2023 Between: Ravuri Krishna Rao, S/o.Venkata Satya Subramanyam, Aged about 62 Occ. Business, R/o.H.No.5/40A, Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. years. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Kurichedu Gram Panchayat, Kurichedu Village, Kurichedu Mandal, Prakasam District Rep by its Panchayat Secretary. 2. The District Panchayat Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rept. by Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 4. Sure Satyanarayana, S/o.Nasaraiah, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Business, R/o.Satyam Medicals, Main Bazar, Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENT^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of Respondents No.1 and 2 in allowing the Respondent No.4 to construct the building without leaving the setbacks contrary to the sanctioned building permission vide proceedings BLR. No. 16/2022 dated 09-06-2022 issued by the Respondent and not initiating the action for demoJition of the structures raised by the 4th Respondent in the setback portion and not initiating the 1st criminal prosecution against the 4th Respondent for deviating the sanction plan and not initiating the proceedings in accordance with Rule 28 of AP Gram Panchayat Land Development (Layout and Building) Rules, 2002 for revoking the building permission dated 09-06-2022 granted in favour of the 4th Respondent by committing misrepresentation as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 to initiate action in accordance with Rule 28 of AP Gram Panchayat Land Development (Layout and building) Rules, 2002 and revoke the building permission vide proceedings BLR.No. 16/2022 dated 09-06-2022 issued in favour of 4th Respondent for committing misrepresentation in obtaining building permission and also demolish the structures raised by the 4th Respondent in the portion meant for setbacks and initiate criminal prosecution against the 4th Respondent in accordance with law in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 not to allow the 4th Respondent to make further construction of the building in pursuant to the building permission vide proceedings BLR.No.16/2022 dated 09-06-2022 issued by the 1st Respondent pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K SREEDHAR MURTHY The Court made the following: ORDER % APHC010061172023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] j MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3088/2023 Between: 1.RAVURI KRISHNA RAO, S/O.VENKATA SATYA SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, KURICHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. R/O.H.NO.5/40A, t. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE KURICHEDU GRAM PANCHAYAT, KURICHEDU VILLAGE, KURICHEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT REP BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. 2.THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT SECRETAf’JAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. AGED ABOUT 63 4.SURC SATYANARAYANA, S/O.NASARAIAH YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.SATYAM MCDICALS, MAIN BAZAR, KURICHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PNAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2.KSREEDHAR MURTHY The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that, on instructions, he filed a Letter dated: 06.03.2025 in the Registry seeking to withdraw this Writ Petition. This Letter is taken on record. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in t^rms of this order. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri P Nagendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Venkata Reddy Gajjala (SC for ZPP, MPP, and Gram Panchayat) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. One CC to Sri K Sreedhar Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies TF I HIGH COURT DATED:10/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.3088 of 2023 § 2 k MAR 2025 W ^ . Current section * DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS