Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65023 (BOM)

MATOSHRI BAHUUDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

WP/13542/2025 · 2025-11-14

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RTE group (1).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 13535 OF 2025 Ekatmik Gramin And Krushi Vikas Sanstha Throgh Its President VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. S. Salunke, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. ... AND 916 WRIT PETITION NO. 13540 OF 2025 Sanskar Bharati Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sasntha Through Its Headmaster VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dehple, Advocate for respondent No.5. … AND 917 WRIT PETITION NO. 13542 OF 2025 Matoshri Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha Through Its President VERSUS The Union Of India And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dehple, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... AND 918 WRIT PETITION NO. 13543 OF 2025 Anand Education Society Undirgaon Through Its President VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. T. Bhagat, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. B. Parnere, Advocate for respondent No.5. … AND 920 WRIT PETITION NO. 13545 OF 2025 Shri Janta Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretary And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Solanke, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... [1] 2025:BHC-AUG:31480-DB RTE group (1).odt AND 922 WRIT PETITION NO. 13547 OF 2025 Shri Lahugad Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its President VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. H. Mewara, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. S. S. Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for respondent No.5. … AND 923 WRIT PETITION NO. 13548 OF 2025 Ekatmik Gramin And Krushi Vikas Sanstha Throgh Its President VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. H. Mewara, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent No.5. … AND 928 WRIT PETITION NO. 13553 OF 2025 Ahilyajot Shikshan Va Krida Prasarak Mandal Through Its President VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. U. Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. S. S. Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... AND 938 WRIT PETITION NO. 13570 OF 2025 Ekatmik Gramin And Krushi Vikas Sanstha Throgh Its President VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. A. R. Nikam, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... AND 944 WRIT PETITION NO. 13576 OF 2025 Rajmata Jijau Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal And Others VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... [2] RTE group (1).odt AND 953 WRIT PETITION NO. 13589 OF 2025 Maulana Azad Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha Through Its Secretary VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... AND 956 WRIT PETITION NO. 13593 OF 2025 Parivartan Sanstha Bajar Wahegaon Through Its Secretary Pramod K Aarsud VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... AND 958 WRIT PETITION NO. 13595 OF 2025 Shanti Pratishthan Kingaon Sanchalit School Thr Its Headmaster VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. S. Salunke, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... AND 964 WRIT PETITION NO. 13601 OF 2025 Saptagiri Pratishthan Nanded Sanchalit School Thr Its President VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others … Mr. D. B. Pokale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Solanke, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent No.5. … CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 14 NOVEMBER 2025 ORDER : . These are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the respective petitioners/management under the Right of [3] RTE group (1).odt Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 3. Issue notice to the respondents in all the petitions. Learned AGPs waive notice for respondents/State in respective petitions. Learned Advocates Mr. S. R. Dheple, Mr. S. B. Parnere, Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Mr. A. R. Nikam, Mr. U. B. Bondar, Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi and Mr. R. S. Pawar waive notice for respondent No.5/Zilla Parishad in respective petitions. 4. We have heard both the sides. 5. We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners proposals independently on their own merits and take appropriate decisions as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if they are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to them within a period of four weeks thereafter. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [4]