Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010016592025 2025:GAU-AS:1173 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/491/2025 RATUL TALUKDAR AND 6 ORS SON OF LT. KUMUD TALUKDAR, R/O- BHOTANA MAHITARA, DISTRICT- BAJALI , ASSAM, PIN- 781328. 2: RANJIT CHAUHAN SON OF- SRI MOHESH CHAUHAN RESIDENT OF- VILL. NIZ AMBAGAON DISTRICT- UDALGURI ASSAM PIN- 784510. 3: MRINMOY DEKA SON OF- SRI MANI DEKA RESIDENT OF VILL- KAGRABARI P.O.- KAGRABARI P.S.- BARBARI DISTRICT- BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781344. 4: CHARJUL AMIN SON OF- SRI GARIBAR NEWAZ RESIDENT OF- VILL- GHORAPAR SANTHAMOW DISTRICT- NALBARI Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM PIN- 781369. 5: DHRUBAJIT TALUKDAR SON OF- SRI DALIM TALUKDAR RESIDENT OF VILL- DALAJANI P.O.- ANANDA BAZAR DISTRICT- BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781318. 6: ZAKIR HUSSAIN SON OF- SRI HABIBOR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF- VILL- NO. 2 KAWADI SONAIKOLA P.O.- SONAIKOLA P.S.- MANIKPUR DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783391. 7: IMAMUL HAQUE SON OF ISMAIL HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DWANGURI P.O.- BAGANGAON DISTRICT- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN- 783390 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-1. 2:THE STAFF SELCTION COMMISSION Page No.# 3/4 REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN BLOCK NO. 12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-03. 3:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION GUWAHATI ASSAM HOUSE FED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE BLOCK NO. 10 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 03. 5:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL SASHATRA SEEMA BALL 5-6 VIVEKANANDA MARG EAST BLOCK R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI-22. 6:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE (RECRUITMENT) EAST BLOCK-07 LEVEL-4 SECTOR-01 R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI-66. 7:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE BLOCK NO. 13 CGO COMPLEX Page No.# 4/4 LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 03 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U SAIKIA, MR. Z ISLAM,MR. S D ROY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R 05.02.2025 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since each of the petitioners had secured different marks in the selection process in question, there may be clash of interest between them and therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw this petition and file separate and individual writ petitions. Prayer stands allowed. This writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with a liberty to the petitioners to file fresh and individual writ petitions. JUDGE Comparing Assistant