RAM CHANDER JAISWAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/19202/2025 · 2025-07-31
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65012 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65012 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129511-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19202 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Chander Jaiswal Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devi Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal and Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred, inter-alia, for the following relief:-
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to make the payment of adequate and reasonable Commercial compensation amount Rs. 57,500/- per square meter in accordance with the circle rate of the said area with the interest and damages charges passing out the four Lane widening of road NH 29(E) Jangal Kaudia to Sonauli over to the applicant/petitioner's Land Acquired by the respondents, Araji no. 262M area 0.012 hectare situated at Village- Purandarpur Sonbarsa, Tappa-Lehra, Pargana-Haveli, Tehsil- Nautanwa, District-Maharajganj which has been demolished without determining and making the adequate payment of compensation amount to the applicant/petitioner in accordance with law. ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authority to decide the Panchayat case of 2024 (Ram Chander Vs. Union of India through Chief Secretary Ministry of Road, Transport and National Highway and others) Under Section 30 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 R/W Section-3(G) 5 NHAI Act 1956, pending before the respondent no. 2 District Magistrate/Collector, Panchayat Officer, District-Maharajganj within stipulated time and period as provided and fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice."
3. The record reveals that against the award for lesser compensation the petitioner has already preferred an application under Section 3G of the National Highways Act, 1956, which is pending consideration before the
Arbitrator/District Magistrate, Maharajganj.
4. Considering the facts and situation, without adverting on the merits of the case, leaving it open for the petitioner to press his relief in the ongoing proceeding before the Arbitrator.
5. With the aforesaid leave, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Ranjeet Sahu Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad