Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6501 (GAU)

BINDU BHUSAN BANIK v. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/2225/2025 · 2025-05-04

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010015782025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2225/2025 BINDU BHUSAN BANIK S/O.- LATE JATINDRA MOHAN BHANIK, RESIDENT OF MISSION PARA, P.O. DIGBOI, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX HAVING OFFICE AT MILAN NAGAR LANE-F P.O. C.R. BUILDING DIBRUGARH-786003. 3:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX CENTRAL GST DIVISION TINSUKIA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT DURGABARI ROAD TINSUKIA ASSAM- 786123 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M NIROLA, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, GST Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 05-05-2025 Ms. M. Nirola, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel representing Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, GST are present. Ms. Nirola, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty, to file afresh. Mr. Jain has submitted that he has no objection to the said prayer. In view of the above submission made by Ms. Nirola, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant