Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64997 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR GIRI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/13653/2025 · 2025-09-17

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13653 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following relief: "a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no.2 to accord the benefit of pension and other retiral dues to the petitioner, forthwith" 3. It is submitted that in the above regard petitioner has approached the authority by making representations on 06.11.2024 and 24.02.2025 but no order has been passed thereupon. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection in the event representation of petitioner is directed to be disposed of by the respondent in accordance with law. Learned Standing Counsel submits that respondent No. 2 is the competent authority in the matter. 5. In view of the above this petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.2 to consider and dispose of the pending representations of petitioner dated 06.11.2024 and 24.02.2025 within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law and by means of a reasoned and speaking order. September 18, 2025 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Chandra Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Vinod Kumar Giri .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad