CWP-23172-2015 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (269-3) CWP-23172-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision : July 31, 2025 Satya Parkash and others .. Petitioners Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Panipat and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Arshad Ali, Advocate, for Ms. Amrita Nagpal, Advocate, (joined through VC) for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Jhanji, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Shashank Shekhar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rohit Khanna, Advocate, Ms. Simran Sharma, Advocate Mr. Saurabh Gautam, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Kohli, Advocate Mr. Saksham Mahajan, Advocate and Mr. Shrey Sachdeva, Advocate, for respondent No.3. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. In the present writ petition, the claim of the petitioners is for the enhancement of the compensation as awarded by the Labour Court vide order dated 27.02.2013 (Annexure P-1). 2. It may be noticed that benefit of compensation has to be given to the petitioners-workmen under Section 25-FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as ‘1947 Act’). The said provision only HARSHA RANI 2025.08.02 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-23172-2015 (O&M) 2 envisages the entitlement of compensation in case management or ownership of an undertaking is transferred. 3. In the present case, it has already come on record that respondent No.2-M/s Dhilion Cool Drinks and Breweries Ltd had offered the petitioners-workmen the benefit of compensation which they never accepted but still, an enhanced amount of compensation has been given to them to the tune of Rs. 1 lac though the standard amount of compensation which the workmen would have got is around Rs.25,000/-. 4. Keeping in view the fact that Rs.75,000/- more than the usual amount of compensation has already been granted to them, no ground is made out for any interference by this Court so as to enhance the compensation as being claimed in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 6. Civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands disposed of. July 31, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.08.02 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document