Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64963 (KAR)

VEERUPAKSHA SANNAPPA NAIK v. MRUTHYUNJAYA S/O VITTAPPA CHOWDHARI

WP/107087/2023 · 2025-08-18

Suraj Govindaraj

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10396 WP No. 107087 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107087 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VEERUPAKSHA SANNAPPA NAIK AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. BANAVASI, TQ. SIRSI, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA, PIN CODE. 581318. …PETITIONER (BY SRIYUTHS. LAXMESH P MUTAGUPPE, HEMAVATI P. MUTAGUPPE AND SANGAMESH GHULAPPANAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: MRUTHYUNJAYA S/O VITTAPPA CHOWDHARI, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MAIN ROAD, BANAVASI, TQ. SIRSI, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA, PIN CODE. 581318 …RESPONDENT (BY SRIYUTHS. SOURABH HEGDE AND SOUMYA HEGDE, ADVOCATES) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A) A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT QUASHING THE ORDER DATED. 03-10-2023 PASSED IN M.A. NO. 15/2022 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE SIRSI ON I.A. NO. 1 IN O.S. NO. 149/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. B.PASS SUCH OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT TO PASS IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING AN ORDER OF COSTS. Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10396 WP No. 107087 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) A writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the order dated. 03-10- 2023 passed in M.A. No. 15/2022 by the Senior Civil Judge Sirsi on I.A. No. 1 in O.S. No. 149/2020 vide Annexure-A. b) Pass such other writ, order or direction as deemed fit to pass in the circumstances of the case including an order of costs. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo, which reads as under: “Memo For Withdrawal of the Matter That in the top noted Petition. Petitioner has called in question the I A No. 1/2020 in O.S.No. 149/2020 passed by the IInd Add. Civil Judge & II Add. JMFC at Sirsi. That now both parties are compromised in the suit matter and settled in terms before Trial Court. Hence the Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to permit the withdrawal of the writ petition due to ends of justice. Hence this memo.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10396 WP No. 107087 of 2023 3. The Memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE VB CT:PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 151