$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010507082025 + W.P.(CRL) 2335/2025 BALDEV SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aditya Bose, Advocate. (VC) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha (ASC, Criminal for State) along with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mrs. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advs. SI Kailash and HC Kuldeep, PS: R. K. Puram Mr. Shreesh Chadha, Mr. Amit Anand and Mr. Irene, Advs. for complainant. (VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 14.09.2026 The matter was listed for 11.09.2026 and is taken up today as 11.09.2026 was declared as a holiday on account of BRICS Summit, 2026. 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and respondent no.1 have rightly pointed out the order dated 07.09.2026 passed in W.P.(CRL) 2730/2026, and they contend that the petitioners are not entitled to any relief. It be noted that the petitioners were avoiding their appearance before the Court of competent jurisdiction. Various opportunities seem to have been granted. 2. The order dated 05.11.2022 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2026 at 13:04:15 (NI Act) relates to the issuance of non-bailable warrants. The order dated 20.04.2024 relates to declaring the petitioner no.1 as a proclaimed person, and the order dated 09.05.2024 relates to the direction of filing of FIR under Section 174A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. There is no justification shown by the petitioners to challenge the impugned orders. 3. Even otherwise, in order dated 07.09.2026, the Court has made the following observations: “1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite undertaking, Sukhwinder Kumar is not appearing before the concerned Court. 2. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to file an appropriate application seeking cancellation of bail to Sukhwinder Kumar i.e. respondent no.10, who has now been declared Proclaimed Offender by the Trial Court. 3. With respect to other accused persons, who are under police custody, it is directed that they shall be produced through Video Conferencing by the concerned Superintendent of Jail. 4. With respect to Baldev Singh i.e. respondent no.11, the police authorities are directed to ensure that he is produced before the concerned Court. If Baldev Singh fails to appear, the police is directed to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid observations, no further adjudication is required in the instant petition. 6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.” 4. Accordingly, no further directions are required to be issued. 5. It be noted that as of now, petitioner no.2 has not been declared as a proclaimed person. If petitioner no.2 is in judicial custody in another case, let he be permitted to appear through Video Conferencing. The said arrangement shall be made by the concerned Jail Authorities. 6. The petition fails and is hereby dismissed. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 P This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2026 at 13:04:15