Shaik Abdul ALam S/o S.M. Dismail v. Union of India rep by The Divisional Railway manager
WP/22502/2006 · 2025-09-01
Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6495 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6495 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010061092006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.22502 OF 2006 Between: Shaik Abdul Alam, S/o.S.M.Dismail; Aged: 45 years, Occ: Sr.Booking Clerk, Guntkal Railway Station, S.C. Railway, Guntkal Division, Ananthapur District. ...Petitioner
AND Union of India, Represented by it’s the Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel), South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal, Ananthapur District. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.T.S.K. Trilok Raj Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Jupudi V.K. Yagnadutt
Central Government Counsel The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble NJS,J)
Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasion, there was no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition.
2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non–prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
_____________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J September 02, 2025 vasu