SURYAKANT KRISHNAJI @ KRISHNARAO DESHMUKH v. SITARAM JYOTIRAM LAHANE AND ORS
CA/6674/2009 · 2025-11-25
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64943 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64943 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 84 ca 6674.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6674 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2005 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 13243 OF 2008 Suryakant Krishnaji @ Krishnarao Deshmukh .. Applicant Versus Sitaram Jyotiram Lahane and others .. Respondents Shri A. I. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Shri V. J. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. None for the respondents.
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2025.
FINAL ORDER : . Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Present application is for condonation of delay and for restoration of civil application in second appeal as well as second apeal. For the reasons stated in the application it is desirable to restore the civil application as well as second appeal, however, subject to fulfillment of condition imposed while passing order in Civil Application No. 1998 of 2019.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the civil
2 84 ca 6674.09 application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘C’. The civil application is disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Nov. 25