Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6494 (AP)

Bapanapalli Lakshmikanthamma v. Doppalapudi Mallikarjuna Rao

SA/805/2004 · 2025-03-24

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010060982004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 805/2004 Between: 1. BAPANAPALLI LAKSHMIKANTHAMMA, W/O. LAKSHMAIAH 2. BAPANAPALLI LAKSHMAIAH, WORKING IN FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AT GUNTUR, R/O. BAPATLA. 3. THUMMAPUDI NAGENDRAMMA, W/O. KOTESWARA RAO R/O. BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THUMMAPUDI KOTESWARA RAO, ATTENDER, ARTS COLLEGE, PODILI, R/O. BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. DOPPALAPUDI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O. RAMANAYUDU MEDICAL PARACTITIONER R/O. VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE BAPATLA MUNICIPALITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT, COMMISSIONER, THE COMMISSIONER, THE BAPATLA MUNICIPALITY, BAPATLA, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. R RADHA KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S NIRANJAN REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.805 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T: Learned counsel representing Sri S.Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 2. None appeared for the appellants, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. There was no representation for the appellants today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 24.03.2025 Pmk 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.805 OF 2004 Date:24.03.2025 Pmk