IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 147 RAJINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a official respondents the hands of respondent dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, lear submitted that the petitioner 20.05.2025 before the P-2) raising their has not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the directions are issued to Hoshiarpur to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: RAJINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocate for the Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondents No. 4 & 5 and to take action on dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P-2). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Senior Superintendent of Police, their grievances as mentioned in the present has not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Senior decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5686 OF 2025 Date of decision: 28.05.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation ned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Hoshiarpur (Annexure in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further would be satisfied if appropriate Senior Superintendent of Police, decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and of the the at their representation has recently filed a representation on Hoshiarpur (Annexure the same further satisfied if appropriate of Police, and Jyoti 2025.05.29 08:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present p of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of one month with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 28.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5686 OF 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present p of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P one month from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.5686 OF 2025 -2- Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-2) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, has the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.05.29 08:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document