Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64924 (MAD)

Venkatachalapathy v. State by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL MP/11887/2025 · 2025-06-24

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.11887 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.694 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.06.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.11887 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.694 of 2025 Venkatachalapathy ...Petitioner Vs. State By The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Burgur, Krishnagiri District Crime No.3 of 2020 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 483 of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in S.C.No.65 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Magalir Neethimandram, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District, dated 18.10.2024 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the criminal appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.11887 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.694 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Magalir Neethimandram, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District, in S.C.No.65 of 2021 dated 18.10.2024, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal. 2. The petitioner, who is an accused in S.C.No.65 of 2021, was convicted and sentenced by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Magalir Neethimandram, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District, vide judgment dated 18.10.2024, as follows: Rank of the accused Conviction under Section Sentence awarded Sole accused 376(2) of IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.11887 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.694 of 2025 4. This Court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence since the Trial Court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and also finds that the petitioner had committed very serious and heinous offence as against the victim girl who is mentally challenged and speech-impaired. 5. In the result, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. 24.06.2025 (2/2) Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1.The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Magalir Neethimandram, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Burgur, Krishnagiri District 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.11887 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.694 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Lpp Crl.M.P.No.11887 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.694 of 2025 24.06.2025 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis