IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ( Sr. No. 146 ) CWP No.16000 of 2025 Date of decision: 28.05.2025 Reshma Devi and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 – Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa to take a decision on the representation dated 28.04.2025 (Annexure P-6) moved by the petitioners. (2) Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. (3) Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 - Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa to take a decision on the aforesaid representation moved by the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. SUNIL YADAV 2025.05.29 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh CWP No.16000 of 2025 [2] (4) Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. ( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE 28.05.2025 ( LAPITA BANERJI ) sunil yadav JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2025.05.29 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh