Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64921 (BOM)

SEETARAM DNYANOBA KEDAR v. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD, THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND ANOTHER

WP/922/2022 · 2025-12-15

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1-wp-922-2022.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 922 OF 2022 Seetaram Dnyanoba Kedar VERSUS Shriram Transport Finance Co Ltd, Thr Its Power Of Attorney Holder And Another ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Seema Gaikwad h/f Mr. Pramod Gaikwad ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATED : DECEMBER 15, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By way of present petition, the petitioner assails the order dated 05.02.2020 passed below Exhibit-12 by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur in Arbitration Regular Darkhast No.281 of 2017, whereby the Executing Court issued recovery warrant against Judgment Debtor No.2. As the order was passed against Judgment Debtor No.2 and despite of service, nobody appeared earlier, therefore, pursuant to the application Exhibit-12, the Executing Court issued recovery warrant against Judgment Debtor No.2. 3. I do not find any perversity in the order dated 05.02.2020 passed below Exhibit-12 by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur in Arbitration Regular Darkhast No.281 of 2017. 2025:BHC-AUG:35252 1-wp-922-2022.odt (2) 4. In view thereof, the petition is dismissed. No order as to cost. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Mujaheed//