245 BHUPESH CHANDER PERSIDING OFFICER COURT, PANIPAT CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.1908 of 2018 titled Tribunal- the petitioner that the has been held to be non approach the Educational Tribunal, 2. Court in Savitri Devi’s case (supra), (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16835 Date of Decision : 25 BHUPESH CHANDER VERSUS PERSIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, PANIPAT AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Praagbir Singh Dhindsa, for Mr. Rajdeep Singh Cheema, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties concedes the factum that keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.1908 of 2018 titled “Savitri Devi Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial -cum-Labour Court and ors.”, decided on 12.09.2024, the petitioner that the impugned award is bad, as the claim of the petitioner has been held to be non-maintainable and the petitioner was directed to approach the Educational Tribunal, has to be upheld Keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this Savitri Devi’s case (supra), the impugned award dated 16.04.2018 (Annexure P-4) is set aside and the Labour Court is directed to consider the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 16835-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25-03-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate Praagbir Singh Dhindsa, Advocate Mr. Rajdeep Singh Cheema, Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) parties concedes the factum that keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in LPA “Savitri Devi Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Labour Court and ors.”, decided on 12.09.2024, the claim of impugned award is bad, as the claim of the petitioner maintainable and the petitioner was directed to as to be upheld. Keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this the impugned award dated 16.04.2018 4) is set aside and the Labour Court is directed to consider the LABOUR ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI parties concedes the factum that keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in LPA “Savitri Devi Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial the claim of impugned award is bad, as the claim of the petitioner maintainable and the petitioner was directed to Keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this the impugned award dated 16.04.2018 4) is set aside and the Labour Court is directed to consider the SAPNA GOYAL 2025.04.01 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16835-2018 (O&M) -2- reference and decide the present case on the basis of the facts and evidence, which will come on record hence, the present petition is disposed of in terms of LPA No.1908 of 2018 titled “Savitri Devi Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court and ors.”, decided on 12.09.2024. 3. The parties are directed to appear before the Labour Court on 22.04.2025. 25-03-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.04.01 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document