Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2025 DAILYLAW 6491 (PNJ)
RAMANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/56888/2025 · 2026-01-12
Aaradhna Sawhney
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6491 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6491 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
! "#$%$%
# &'(% ( () * ! "# !"#
$%#&
' ( $"%'$
))) ()+%, '-
Petitioner, an accused in case FIR No.142 dated 20.09.2025 registered against him, under Section 420 IPC at Police Station Dhariwal, District Gurdaspur, has filed the petition for grant of pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of BNSS.
*#
&
&
& &
*+,
!" #
$
% &" '(')
$ %
## "
# & !*
+ #
$% !
,
# !
- - .'(((( /
PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.15 18:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
0#
#
!" $% #
# 1 #
-
" ,#
$%
(2 (3 '(')
-
4 "
!-
# " 5 ,
#
(2 "
#
(2 "
6 #
#
!
# #
,
-
278.3 (9 / : !-
6 4
" "
! !- 0
# " #
#"# " !-
4
# $%
- .'(((( /#
$%
-
4
!"
## # !
!"
#
FIR No.142 dated 20.09.2025, under Sections 420 IPC was registered against the petitioner. - %
$
# *&
& . * / %
* !
$ ' ( +
0 0 %# +&$
* 1 /
&
*
*&
&*$
#*
&.
.* & !*
+
* *. *&
& 2
&$
%*$ 1& *
# &
PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.15 18:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
- 3 *
# 4&5
+
&
# &
& *
+ &* +
'
# % &
*
+ *. $
6 & *
$# ' # * 0 1 0 1+
1 % &#
# & *
7
+
+ *
*
&7 2
8
#
.
.
&
+
(
7
$ *
&
*+ #
.& *
+**
#*
4&.
%
3 *
5 2
*
&
* + 7& *
+ ' %
.
* &*
&
$&
*& + * ( & 92+ * 1
$ *
&
*$ & #
+
&*
#
&
(+
*
&
*
&
& *
&# .
*
2
& *
& # $
. + . # : *+
$ $ " .
*&$ "#
*$" &' *( 7
&
$+*
6
* *
&
*
+ #*
$& & *
. * *.
+ * *
4&5 PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.15 18:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
1 '
- $ 6 &
. $#
"
&
6 .$ & -$ $ ; #
&
&&
**
& *
2 *
*
&
*
&&
$& *
+ &
&7 &*7
&
$ *
&
*&
&#+ 7
*
* 7 &
3
.* *$ 45
&
+
&7$+ **
#*#$+ ** #
$ * &#
. & *
" *
+ . 2 # *
&
*
& **. &
& < = 3
.
. *
&
* $+ * &
8
> * $+
& 7
+* *
+
*&
& . *$ # & 8
> *
?
!"+ #
, #$ % & ' & 37 ; "
#
#
"
# !
)2< =
"
!= "
# /!
!
" =
5
#
!
"= #
#
"
#
>
! "
# # 5
#
# PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.15 18:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
#
#
"! ? 8( ??????? 89 , '9
#
#6
!
# #
!" =
! !" 0
# !", '9
#
#6
# 4 # !"
# , ?=
! !"+ 6 ( )* +& , ( )* +& - .
/ -
!.
0
#
"!
#, '9
#
#6 @$ ''38% 8 ?:# ##
)2<
#
#
#, '9 6 #
)2<
A
)9
#
#
#
"! 6
! @ B:
!#
"=
!= C 6
#
)2<
#
#
#9782 A
-
# A
"!
#
"
#
0
,
"!
!
# 6 "
"
#
#
#
#
6
!
#, '9
#
,
/
"
#
##
!
# , '9 $ % 8' :
# # !
#
)2<
# D
!"
#
!
"
# ! #
! !5
"
" 0
-
##
5
##
- #
! 4
!! !
E#
!"
# PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.15 18:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
6
! #
"!
#
#
, '9
#
#6 82
83????????? 88 ,##
( , & 1( (
2 !/
- !0
5
!
"! !
" =
,3 1 + !
.4 /
!250
@$ 2<3 97% 97 #
#
"!
## 4
! # # #
#
,
" ! !
" =
#
# #"!
!" $ , * $+6 7 ( 4 !
!.!/ 4
.!-0, ( ( 8 96 ( 96 5 ./ 5
420,: ; < =11& 5 .
.
-/
0 + In Nikita Jagganath Shetty @ Nikita Vishwajeet Jadhav vs. The State of Maharashtra and another, 2025 AIR SC 3375, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that “Anticipatory bail is an exceptional remedy and ought not to be granted in a routine manner.” #
&7&
$ & *
*
92 # * .
&
9 &
&
*
*
92 **
*#** . & *
& *
+
6
.*& & * $ +
&
%
.&
*
&&
* ; 7
& *
* $ + &7 *
# + PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.15 18:13 I agree to specified portions of this document
<
*
+ + **.&
& *
9
3*
+. $ $ ;+ 7
.
# & *
%
* 7
.
& *
* 3&
7
+
* + *
* &72
+** *
+*
+& +* &2
#+ &
#$
& *
+ **
#*#
&7+
&
. .#
*
&
$+ .*
#*#
&7 * &#
. & *
0 Resultantly, petitioner has not been able to make out a case of exceptional depravity/hardship in his favour, entitling him for the grant of this extraordinary relief of pre-arrest bail. 10.
10. The petition being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed. , ()- $%$% - @ 7
;
,A ;B @ * ,A ;B PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.15 18:13 I agree to specified portions of this document