- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8997-DB CCC No. 100218 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100218 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MAHEBOOBSAB S/O. BALESAB, AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF BIRALADINNI, TALUK: YELBURGA, DISTRICT. KOPPAL, PINCODE-583231. 2. MAHAMMADRAFI S/O. BALESAB, AGE ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF BIRALADINNI, TALUK: YELBURGA, DISTRICT. KOPPAL, PINCODE-583231. 3. SHEBINBABU S/O. BALESAB, AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF BIRALADINNI, TALUK: YELBURGA, DISTRICT. KOPPAL, PINCODE-583231. 4. AMEENASAB S/O. BALESAB, AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF BIRALADINNI, TALUK: YELBURGA, DISTRICT. KOPPAL, PINCODE-583231. - COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. SHIVANAND MALASHETTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. MAHESH H.MALAGITTI, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL, DISTRICT. KOPPAL, PINCODE: 2. SRI. PRANEESH, THE TAHASILDAR, YALABURGA, TALUK. YALABURGA, DISTRICT. KOPPAL, PINCODE: – ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY AAG, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD. - PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R3) VINAYAKA B V Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.07.22 11:28:36 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8997-DB CCC No. 100218 of 2025 THIS CCC IS FILED U/S 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO PUNISH ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 FOR VIOLATION OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 22.11.2024 PASSED IN W.P. NO.106936/2024 (GM-CPC) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E & ETC. THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS) Learned counsel for the complainants has filed a memo stating that the complainants are not interested to prosecute the contempt proceedings. Therefore they seek leave of this Court to withdraw the contempt petition. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE BVV / CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10