Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64903 (ORI)

SUKANTA KUMAR DEHURY v. TP WESTERN ODISHA DISTRIBUTION LIMITED (TPWODL), SAMBALPUR

WP(C)/31809/2024 · 2025-01-15

S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.31809 of 2024 Sukanta Kumar Dehury …. Petitioner Represented By Adv. Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria -versus- TP Western Odisha Distribution Limited (TPWODL), represented by the Chief Executive Officer, TPWODL Corporate Office, Burla, Sambalpur &Another. …. Opposite Parties Represented By ASC Mr. Sonak Mishra Mr. S. Sourav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rajeet Roy, Advocate for TPWODL CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 15.01.2025 03. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: - (i) Admit the writ petition; p. 2 p. 2 (ii) Issue Rule NISI or appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions calling upon the opposite parties particularly opposite party no-2 to show cause and if they fail to show cause issue appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions by regularisation of service benefits, grant of increment and other entitled official benefits along with performance Incentives w.e.f. 29.04.2015; (iii) And, further be pleased to direct the opposite parties to take appropriate steps to consider the name of the Petitioner for promotion from the date of the appointment; (iv) Pass such other order/orders, direction /directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioner has already approached the authority by way of the representation dated 12.12.2023 ventilating his grievance. But, the said representation is still pending before the authority. 5. In such view of the matter and without going into the merit of the case, the authority concerned is directed to dispose of the aforesaid representation of the Petitioner by passing a reasoned order within a period of two weeks from the date of presentation/ production of an authenticated copy of this order. p. 3 p. 3 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. (Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge Gitanjali Designation: P.A.