Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64887 (ALL)

JAHANGEER @ KALA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/20954/2025 · 2025-07-24

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123548 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20954 of 2025 Applicant :- Jahangeer @ Kala Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Aslam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant-with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.69 of 2025, registered under Section 8/29 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Chilkana, District Saharanpur, during pendency of the trial. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Prosecution story is that 15 gm. smack was recovered from the possession of the co-accused Haseeb. The applicant is not named in the F.I.R.; his name surfaced in the statement of co-accused, Haseeb, before the police. The quantity of alleged contraband involved in the present is below the commercial quantity. Further contention is that the statutory provisions of Sections 50 and 52 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 have not been complied with in the right manner; Co-accused Sabir has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.6.2025 in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 19674 of 2025. The applicant has two criminal history, which has been duly explained in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that the applicant is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. It has also been submitted that the applicant is in jail since 23.04.2025. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. 5. The Apex Court in the Case of Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Keshari, (2007) 7 SCC 798 has held that the court while considering the application for bail with reference to Section 37 of the Act is not called upon to record a finding of not guilty. It is for the limited purpose essentially confined to the question of releasing the accused on bail that the court is called upon to see if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and records its satisfaction about the existence of such grounds. But the court has not to consider the matter as if it is pronouncing a judgment of acquittal and recording a finding of not guilty. 6. Considering the facts of the case and keeping in mind, the ratio of the Apex Court's judgment in the case of Union of India (supra), larger mandate of Article 21 of the constitution of India, the nature of accusations, the nature of evidence in support thereof, the severity of punishment which conviction will entail, the character of the accused-applicant, circumstances which are peculiar to the accused, reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the trial, reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tampered with, the larger interest of the public/ State and other circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail. 7. Let the applicant, Jahangeer @ Kala be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Dhirendra/ Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad