Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64876 (PNJ)

SUNITA DEVI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/15967/2025 · 2025-05-28

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15967-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 145 SUNITA DEVI STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the the SSA Leave as E 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Ha notice on behalf of the respondents representation is filed by the petitioner will be decided by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of of receiving the representation 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: SUNITA DEVI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to release the due benefits by counting the SSA Leave as E-leave with all the consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case she is permitted representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Ha notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner within two week will be decided by the second respondent/District speaking order in accordance with law within a period of of receiving the representation. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15967-2025 Date of Decision: 28.05.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA inter alia, seeking a writ of respondents to release the due benefits by counting leave with all the consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the he is permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, accepts , and submits that in case any such ithin two weeks from today, the same District, Education Officer, by speaking order in accordance with law within a period of six months In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. seeking a writ of respondents to release the due benefits by counting Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified , accepts , and submits that in case any such , the same , by months In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner Aman Dua 2025.05.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-15967-202 6. Ordered 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 28.05.2025 Ad 2025 -2- Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.05.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document