Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
1518(2 cases)
CWP-2308- Kiranjit Kaur
CWP-22909 Sunita Devi
CORAM: HON
Present :
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
list prepared on 15.07.2014 for appointment of Ward No.8, District Sangrur and the sel might not even be surviving due to the efflux of time, of there being no interim order.
2.
unable to establish contact with the petitioner
3.
revived by demonstrating that the
4.
15.07.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1518(2 cases)
Date of decision
-2015 Kiranjit Kaur vs.
State of Punjab 22909-2016 Sunita Devi vs.
State of Punjab
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
None for the petitioner in CWP Mr. Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP-22909 Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab Mr. Mohit Saini, Advocate for Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate, for respondents No.5 to 8.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petitions for quashing the merit list prepared on 15.07.2014 for appointment of Ward No.8, District Sangrur and the selection of respondents No.5 t might not even be surviving due to the efflux of time, of there being no interim order.
Learned counsel states that despite best efforts, he is also unable to establish contact with the petitioner
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner revived by demonstrating that the lis still subsists. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 15.07.2025 f Punjab and Others f Punjab and Others BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
None for the petitioner in CWP-2308-2015. Mr. Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate,
22909-2016. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Mohit Saini, Advocate for
for respondents No.5 to 8. Prayer made in the present petitions for quashing the merit list prepared on 15.07.2014 for appointment of Anganwari Workers in ection of respondents No.5 to 8, might not even be surviving due to the efflux of time, especially in wake
Learned counsel states that despite best efforts, he is also unable to establish contact with the petitioner in CWP-22909-2016. ed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it still subsists.
Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.15 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.