PREMANANDA BEHERA v. MANAS RANJAN BARIK,PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,LAW DEPT.,BBSR,KHURDA
CONTC/5537/2025 · 2026-05-08
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, Harish Tandon Cj
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6487 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6487 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 5537 of 2025
Premananda Behera …. Petitioner Mr. Pratyasish Mohanty, Advocate -versus- Sri Manas Ranjan Barik, Principal Secretary, Law Department, Bhubaneswar and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Debashis Tripathy, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 08.05.2026
05.
1. It appears that the instant contempt application is taken out by the petitioner beyond the period of limitation provided under Section-20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Though an application for condonation of delay is filed, but in view of the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Pallav Sheth v. Custodian and others; reported in (2001) 7 SCC 549, the contempt petition filed beyond the period of limitation is not maintainable.
2. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation.
3. However, the dismissal of the present contempt petition will not prevent the petitioner from exhausting the remedy as available in the statute.
(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
S. Behera