SAROJ SHARMA WIFE OF SHRI JAY PRAKASH SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2203/2025 · 2025-02-27
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6486 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6486 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8701] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1145/2025 Jaypal Singh S/o Shri Bodan Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Nagla Beeja, Tehriyan, Dist Bharatpur. (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director, Directorate, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Director (Non- Gazetted) And Additional Director (Administration), Panchayati Raj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Phalodi (Raj.). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2061/2025 Ramavtar Son Of Shri Devi Lal, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Biparpur, Viparpur, District Dholpur, Under Transfer At Mathuradas Mathur Hospital, Jodhpur ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Director (Non Gazzattee), Medical And Health Services And Additional Director (Administration), Panchyatiraj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Additional Director (Administration), , Medical And Health Services And Additional Director (Administration), Panchyatiraj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dholpur (Raj.)
5. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj.)
6. Medical Officer Incharge, C.h.c. Maniya, District Dholpur (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2062/2025 Mohan Lal Kajla Son Of Shri Narayan Ram Kajla, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 07, Sikar Road, Chala, District Sikar (Raj.) Presently Posted On The Post Of Assistant Development Officer, At Panchayat Samiti Khandela, Sikar (Raj.). [2025:RJ-JP:8701] (2 of 3) [CW-1145/2025] ----Petitioner Versus
1. Secretary Administration, Rural Development And Panchayatraj Department, Rajasthan Jaipur. 2. Zila Parishad, Sikar, Through Its Chief Executive Officer At Sikar (Raj.)
3. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2203/2025 Saroj Sharma Wife Of Shri Jay Prakash Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 5, Chhapar Mohalla, Kumher, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director (Non Gazzattee), Medical And Health Services And Additional Director (Administration), Panchyatiraj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Health Services And Additional Director (Administration), Panchyatiraj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Deeg (Raj.)
5.
Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kumher, Deeg, Bharatpur (Raj.)
6. Anita Kumari, A.n.m., Sub Center Baben, Kumher, Deeg. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Ms. Sara Parveen for respondent No.3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 27/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a
[2025:RJ-JP:8701] (3 of 3) [CW-1145/2025] representation within a period of 7 days before the competent authority. In the facts and circumstances, relying upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, this Court directs the respondent-State that the representation of the petitioners be decided within a period of 15 days from passing of this order in accordance with law and they are at liberty to pass any further order considering the administrative exigencies. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /606, 609, 610,611