Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 64856 (ALL)

KAJAL PAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/18111/2025 · 2025-05-29

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:94160 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18111 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kajal Pal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neetu Mishra,Sanskar Gaur Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 CS/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad