Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:101265 Court No. - 85 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5852 of 2025 Petitioner :- Atul And 2 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Pandey,Santosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed to set-aside the order dated 23.04.2025 passed by Additional Session Judge, Court No. 8, Farrukhabad passed in Criminal Revision No. 263 of 2024 (Atul and others vs. State of U.P. and another) as well as summoning order dated 10.01.2024 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Farrukhabad regarding the Complaint Case No. 1039 of 2023 (Shakuntala Vs. Atul and others) under Sections 323, 504 IPC, pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Farrukhabad and further prayed to stay the proceeding of Complaint Case No. 1039 of 2023 (Shakuntala Vs. Atul and others) under Sections 323, 504 IPC. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage, it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is refused. However, in view of the submissions, it is provided that in case the petitioners move applications for discharge through counsel within 30 days, the same shall be
disposed of by the Trial Court by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within two weeks thereafter. For a period of 30 days or till the disposal of the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid direction, this petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Nisha Digitally signed by :- nisha kumari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad