S. No. 47 Suppl. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 451/2025, CM 1052/2025 IRSHAD AHMAD AND ANR. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Rafiq Bhat, Advocate Vs DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (HOME) AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Mahajabeen, Advocate vice Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 04.03.2025 1. The petitioners, namely Irshad Ahmad and Mst. Nishad Begum both being of the age of majority, have exercised their free will to enter into marital relationship and for that have earned displeasure of their respective families. 2. To lend confirmation to the fact of their marriage having been solemnized out of their free will and volition, the petitioners have put on record a scanned copy of “Nikahnama” dated 21-02-2025. 3. Along with the writ petition, the petitioner No. 2’s date of birth confirming document in the Dental Lounge Dental Clinic, Jawhar Nagar, Srinagar issued by one Dr. Mohammad Saleem, Dental Surgeon, evidencing her age as 22 years approximately is also annexed which confirms the fact that the petitioner No. 2 is and was major at the time of solemnizing marriage with the petitioner No. 1 and so is the petitioner No. 1. 4. The petitioners are in hiding fearing about safety and security of their life and limb suffering wrong at the hands of respondents, who are carrying hard feelings against the petitioners for their act of marrying each other. 5. Keeping in view the mandate and dictate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as laid down in case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP and anr, 2006 (5) SCC 475 in terms whereof a direction has been set into effect for the Govt. Administration and Police Authorities throughout the Country to see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a girl or boy who is also major, then the marrying individuals are not to be harassed by any one nor to be subjected to threats or acts of violence, and in case any such threat or harassment is confronted to be inflicted on the individuals then the persons responsible for holding out such threats/harassments are to be taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the Police against such persons and further stern action to be taken as provided by law. 6. Article 144 of the Constitution of India mandates all Authorities, Civil and Judicial, in the territory of India to act in aid of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Bearing this constitutional sanction in perspective and the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court set into place, it is a matter of duty for the Police Officials as well as officials of the concerned Civil Administration, irrespective of hierarchical position, to ensure that marrying individuals who are major and have chosen to become husband and wife out of their free will and volition are not to fear anybody causing any harm to their life and limb. 7. This petition at the threshold is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Srinagar and the respondent No.3 - Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Rajouri Jammu to ensure by issuing appropriate directions to the respondent No. 4-Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station Hazratbal, Srinagar, Kashmir and the respondent No. 5- Station House Officer, Police Station Dharamsal Kalakote Rajouri Jammu, respectively that the petitioners, namely Irshad Ahmad and Mst. Nishad Begum are not subjected to any harassment/intimidation/threats at the hands of any person by reference to their matrimony and their right to cohabit as married persons. Furthermore, in case the Police Station, Srinagar Kashmir or Police Station Dharamsal Kalakote Rajouri Jammu has registered any FIR/Report at the instance of any family member or any other person against the petitioners or either of the two petitioners by reference to their marriage then also no arrest of the petitioners to be carried out by the said Police Stations. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 04.03.2025 MUBASHIR