THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/103328/2022 · 2025-09-18
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64827 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 64827 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12662 WP No. 103328 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 103328 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE CONSUMER FEDERATION LTD., BRANCH OFFICE AT OPP. TO IDGA MAIDAN, ISR ROAD, HOSAPETE. R/BY ITS MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SHRI. MALLIKARJUN B. PUJAR, AGE 55 YEARS - PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ C. BELLAKKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN & CHILD WELFARE, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALORE-01, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARY DISTRICT, BALLARI.
3.
THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BALLARI (TOWN), DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, K.H.B. COLONY, SRI. SHAKTHI BHAVAN, SONDUR-583119, TQ. SONDUR & DIST. BALLARY.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, SHRI. SEVANIKETAN, DEVINAGAR, BALLARI-583103, TQ. & DIST. BALLARY. - RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, A.G.A.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 21.07.2022 BEARING TENDER NO.CDPO/SDR/EGG/TENDER/1/2022-23 WITH RESPECT TO SANDUR TALUK ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ( PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE ‘A’) & ETC.
Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12662 WP No. 103328 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo and submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
In view of the memo and the submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Needless to state that the right of the petitioner to participate in future tender is not affected by disposing of the present writ petition.
Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE BVV, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 11