SHRI. RAVINDRA BALAPPA MADAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.RP/100311/2022 · 2025-03-20
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6482 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6482 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5128 CRL.RP No. 100311 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100311 OF 2022 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SHRI RAVINDRA BALAPPA MADAR AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC. GRAM SAHAYAK, R/O. 2122/A, MARATHA GALLI, GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI G.B. NAIK AND SMT.P.G. NAIK, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD, (ACB POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI.) …RESPONDENT (BY SANTOSH MALAGOUDAR, SPL.PP)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W.
401 OF CR.P.C.,1973, SEEKING TO CALLING FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN SPECIAL CASE NO.23/2020 AND SET ASIDE THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR PC ACT, BELAGAVI REJECTING THE APPLICATION FOR DISCHARGE U/S. 227 OF CR.P.C. ON 23.08.2022 OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S. 7(a) OF THE PC ACT 1988, AND CONSEQUENTLY DISCHARGING THE REVISION PETITIONER- ACCUSED BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.21 10:35:47 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5128 CRL.RP No. 100311 of 2022
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments for sometime learned counsel Smt.P.G.Naik appearing for petitioner filed a memo stating that reserving liberty to urge the grounds which are raised in the present petition before the trial Court, petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Memo reads as under:
“Herein the memo on behalf of the Rev. Ptn is as under:
That the top noted petition may kindly be
disposed as ‘WITHDRAWN’ in the ends of justice.
Hence the memo.” Memo is placed on record. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RHR/- CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 4